By Gary G. Kohls, MD

Once upon a time, there was an sociopathic, egomaniacal, narcissistic and xenophobic national leader who was attempting to rise to political power in his politically divided, militaristic, post-war nation.

This deeply flawed demagogue, who was worshipped by millions of rabble-rousing, beer-swilling, racist, sexist, gun-toting, anti-Semitic, flag-waving, uber-nationalist, xenophobic, and white/male supremacists, professed that his goal in running for national office was to make his supposedly weak, supposedly under-militarized nation great again.

This charismatic leader distrusted democratic ideals, and he was campaigning to become the sole ruler of his once-democratic nation. He was one of the richest men in the nation partly because of the sales of a block-buster book that he had written with the help of a number of his supporters years before he became politically active.


Definitions (of terms used in this column):

      • A sociopath is a person whose behavior is antisocial, often criminally greedy and lacks a sense of moral responsibility, empathy or social conscience. Sociopaths never sincerely apologize nor are they capable of exhibiting remorse for wrongs that they have committed.
      • A narcissist is a person who has an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration, sexual gratification, applause and a lack of empathy for others.
      • An egomaniac is a pathological egotist, someone with a psychological disorder who exhibits symptoms like delusions of grandeur and an obsession with greatness, power or wealth.
      • A xenophobe is a person who is fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or of people from different countries or cultures.
      • A demagogue is a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational arguments.

This politician was widely despised by majorities of voting age people and was often made fun of by some of the comedians of his era. Despite being an occasional object of ridicule, he was still popular with those that attended his frequent campaign rallies that were sometimes held at airports where he arrived on his private airplane.


This leader often used inflammatory and hate-filled language in his speeches which often incited violence against minority groups from his most rabid followers. He was widely covered by the press because of the perception that he was a newsworthy aberration in the struggling, once-civilized nation that many distressed people thought was in need of new leadership.

This wannabe leader was popular with a coalition of angry, under-employed, xenophobic white supremacists, many of whom were military veterans who had been so physically and psychologically wounded in the last war that they couldnā€™t find employers who were willing to hire them.

Some of his ex-military followers were eager street fighters who pledged allegiance to the nationā€™s flag, which was revered by many of them as sacred symbols of a once-great nation.

This leaderā€™s nation had lost its last war, which had morally and financially bankrupted the nation. That lost war had been stupidly started by out-of-touch, over-privileged, uber-wealthy, right-wing, pro-corporate, militaristic, male-dominated leaders who were controlled by the nationā€™s even-wealthier ruling elites (including war-profiteering bankers, industrialists and politicians). Each of those entities knew that war could have huge economic benefits from interest-paying bank loans, the sale of highly profitable weapons systems and the prospect of pillaging the oil, mineral and labor resources of ā€œenemyā€ nations.

The competitor nations that had been targeted by the nationā€™s predatory banks and corporations in the last war were technically not military adversaries. Therefore, in order to start the potentially profitable war, the political, military and business leaders of the nation had to secretly conspire to orchestrate a false flag operation that would falsely alarm the nation into a patriotic war-hysteria and the willingness to kill those on the other side of the battle line ā€“ including innocent civilians.

The ruling elites of this leaderā€™s nation knew that most wars are started by false flag operations. The ruling eliteā€™s had control of the major media in the nation, so most editors and journalists could be relied upon to not question any of the deceptions that could lead to war or ā€œregime changeā€.

And so any targeted nation that had resource wealth that the aggressor coveted (such as oil), could be accused of actually provoking the desired conflict; and the brain-washed, misinformed, distracted, historically-illiterate, easily duped electorate could be counted upon to go along with the illegal invasion, even if it meant existential disaster for the armed combatants and the unarmed non-combatants.

This particular egomaniacal political leader secretly intended to eventually purge most of the old establishment types from his adopted right-wing, Big Business-controlled political party as soon as he achieved power. He had seemingly come out of nowhere – gaining political notoriety partly because of the fame he gained from his best-selling book and the frequent coverage from a compliant press.

Ultimately this leaderā€™s political aspirations had been given a boost after a world-wide economic collapse and recession which had actually been created by greedy financial institutions and investors that came to support the candidateā€™s campaign to make their nation (and their stock market) great again. If the candidate gained power, the backers knew his election would benefit them financially.

The leader of course refused to accuse the nationā€™s economic problems on the guilty 1% because some of them were backing his election bid.

Instead, he falsely blamed the economic problems on the leftists, the liberals, the democratic socialists and the democracy-embracing political party members who had taken on the impossible task of trying to solve the economic issues that they had not been responsible for in the first place.

An economic crash had tanked the world economy and led to planetary chaos. But the crash had actually been ignited by the reckless and greedy actions of criminally wealthy, manipulative multimillionaires from Big Corporations that escaped the punishment that they so richly deserved because they were too big to fail, too big to criticize and too important to have their reputations besmirched in public.

Many of the cult followers of this egomaniacal leader (who was about as areligious as any politician in the history of the world) were citizens of one of the most advanced, cultured, literate and highly Christianized nations that the world had ever known.

Tragically, the reigning religious leaders of the candidateā€™s nation, totally contrary to the religious beliefs of Jesus of Nazareth and the original form of Christianity, professed a belief in a punitive, vengeful, violent and angry god rather than in the merciful, all-loving, forgiving and nonviolent God as was the clear belief of Jesus and his apostles.

The candidateā€™s Christian nation was highly militarized, whereas participation in the nationā€™s military was actually grounds for excommunication in the early church that knew the pacifist theology of Jesus best.

The nationā€™s military was universally feared (as opposed to being universally ā€œrespectedā€) by other nations but somehow it was revered by most sectors of the candidateā€™s nation, even though the officers and soldiers were frequently and blatantly guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

This nationā€™s police and military possessed the best military intelligence, the best spies and the most lethal weapons systems that the world had ever known ā€“ all at crippling economic costs to the tax-paying population that never showed any positive return on investment (unless the wars had been won and systematic post-war pillaging had been efficiently accomplished).

The personal child-rearing tactics that the candidate had suffered in his childhood were well-known to have been punitive. His absent, authoritarian, but quite successful-in-business father had thoroughly embraced the disastrous spare the rod/spoil the child tactic that has ruined so many militarized nations, which in the case of the candidate, resulted in fear, hatred and resentment of ā€“ but often obedience to – the authoritarian parent.

The punitive child-rearing of boys was the norm in the candidateā€™s nation. That pattern predictably caused many soldiers to reflexively obey – and give – illegal orders in times of crisis and war, and that pattern has resulted in the frequent abuse and even torture of enemy non-combatants, as just one example. Thus, the nationā€™s soldiers quite easily became willing executioners in times of war.

The many followers of this demagogue were led to believe that their nation had been weakened by traitorous domestic and foreign enemies but would soon, if the leader was elected, be made great again. Many of the followers truly believed that their punitive Christian ā€œgodā€ would bless the blatantly areligious leaderā€™s mission and thus somehow enable the religion to have dominion over all the other nations of the world, even if the methods used in the effort were anti-Christian in the extreme.

Because the ā€œchristianā€ followers thought that the candidateā€™s efforts would be blessed by their punitive god, they naturally thought that punishing any dissenters among them was justified, even to the point of banishment, imprisonment, impoverishment, starvation, deportation, torture or even execution.

In other words, the followers of this obviously sociopathic demagogue ā€“ who had a history of being a serial liar with a desire to increase his already significant wealth and power ā€“ abandoned all logic and truly believed that the leader could actually make their country and their religion great again.

In order to convince a plurality of people to vote for him, the candidate fostered a paranoia among his followers that was intended to cause irrational fears (and therefore hatred) of non-citizens, the poor, the non-white, the non-Christian, the refugee, the asylum-seeker or the immigrant yearning to be free.

Many legitimate refugees that were threatening the candidateā€™s nationā€™s borders were fleeing from the consequences of wars, exploitation and the economic chaos that the nationā€™s own giant financial institutions, multinational corporations, national security apparatus and economic hitmen had been responsible for in the first place.

The egomaniacal, sociopathic, narcissistic and xenophobic national leader/fuehrer described above was Adolf Hitler, but it could have been any wannabe fascist dictator in the history of the world. The militarized and economically distressed Christian nation was Germany, and the war that had financially and morally bankrupted Germany was the First World War.

I have constructed the story to be essentially identical with what is known about Donald Trump and his idea of America.

The revered flag mentioned above was the swastika, and the right-wing political party that hated liberals, progressives, socialists and foreigners was the Nazi Party, but it is quite understandable why anyone would think ā€œStars & Stripesā€ and the ā€œTrumpian Republican Partyā€ as they read the story.

And, of course, the targeted minorities were Jews, aboriginal Gypsies, Jehovahā€™s Witnesses, non-Aryans, emancipated German women, gays, lesbians and people of color, all of whom happen to be nearly identical to the targets that Americans are currently being primed to discriminate against.

The false flag operations that gave Hitler a plausible reasons to start World War II were the Reichstag Fire and Operation Himmler, not 9/11 or the fake claims of ā€œweapons of mass destructionā€, which were the false flag operations that were used to justify Americaā€™s global military exploits and perpetual war agenda. (Google ā€œArchitects and Engineers for 9/11 Truthā€ and watch an hourā€™s worth of their videos for the unassailable proof of the assertion that 9/11 was a false flag op.)

But the historical similarities between what I call Friendly American Fascism and the distinctly less friendly Hitlerian variety do indeed exist, and it is not just the fault of Donald Trump.

Indeed, Donald Trump probably has never taken the time to study ANY history books, much less writings about the root causes and conduct of what led up to World War II or the Middle East Wars so one cannot claim that he is actually following the historical playbook of fascist dictators of the past.

History, as they say, doesnā€™t replicate itself exactly, but it often does rhyme.

(One caveat about Trumpā€™s never reading historical books: Ivana Trump, one of Trumpā€™s ex-wives, reported that he kept a copy of Adolf Hitlerā€™s speeches at his bedside. His staff also said that Trump had ā€œplenty of copies of Mein Kampfā€.)

Donald Trumpā€™s ā€œMake America Great Againā€ political campaign does indeed rhyme with the campaigns of many other wannabe dictators throughout history. Napoleon Made France Great Again, Leopold Made Belgium Great Again, Mussolini Made Italy Great Again, Hitler Made Germany Great Again, Franco Made Spain Great Again, Salazar Made Portugal Great Again, Mao Made China Great Again, Pinochet Made Chile Great Again, but each wannabe empire-builder ultimately failed in disgrace after the unintended consequences caused millions to suffer and die in the process.

Each demagogue mentioned in the paragraph above was a sociopathic, narcissistic, egomaniacal, xenophobic and demagogic leader that was willing to say and do anything to gain and secure power and wealth.

And the historical similarities between the psychological aberrancies of the fascist/fuehrer Hitler and far too many political and economic leaders in the world today do exist. Please go to DuluthReader.com for a number of other articles about American Friendly Fascism.

Recall that neither sociopaths, narcissists, egomaniacs, xenophobes or fascists are to be trusted with political, economic or military power. Sociopaths consistently lie and deceive but usually never admit to the fact that they are lying or deceiving.

It is important for voters to understand that, for all intents and purposes, sociopaths and fascists (including their inanimate corporate counterparts) are incurable and need to be isolated from society.


ABOUT AUTHOR:Ā  Dr Kohls is a retired family physician from Duluth, MN, USA. Since his retirement from his holistic mental health practice he has been writing his weekly Duty to Warn column for the Duluth Reader, northeast Minnesotaā€™s alternative newsweekly magazine. His columns, which are re-published around the world, deal with the dangers of American fascism, corporatism, militarization, racism, xenophobia, malnutrition, sea level rise, global warming, geo-engineering, solar radiation management, Big Copper Miningā€™s conscienceless exploitation of northeast Minnesotaā€™s water-rich environment, Big Medicineā€™s over-screening, over-diagnosing, over-treating, Big Pharmaā€™s over-drugging and Big Vaccineā€™s over-vaccination agendas (particularly of tiny infants), as well as other movements that threaten human health, the environment, democracy, civility and the sustainability of life on earth. Many of his columns have been archived at a number of websites, including these four:

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.Ā  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VNR, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or VT Network.Ā  Some content may be satirical in nature.Ā 
All images within are full responsibility of the author and NOT VNR.

Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

2 COMMENTS

  1. Apparently the author believes the jewish narrative re- Hitler, which is the official narrative we’re bombarded with at every turn. The same with Franco. They both saved their countries from becoming communist, in other words being controlled by jews.

  2. One of the minorities that were murdered that you failed to mention, Dr Kohls, a quite significant minority (in terms of the numbers) were the vocal Catholic and Protestant dissidents, mostly priests.

    The following is an excerpt from the article linked below it :

    ‘The Dachau concentration camp was used by the Nazis for many of its most hated enemies. Among them were Catholic priests. Indeed, of the 2,720 clergy sent to Dachau, 2,579 were Catholic priests, along with uncertain numbers of seminarians and lay brothers. Most were Polish priests, 1,748 in all; there were also 411 German priests. Of the 1,034 priests who died in the camp, 868 were Polish. The priests were housed in a special ā€œpriest blockā€ and were targeted for especially brutal treatment by the SS guards.

    It is estimated that at least 3,000 other Polish priests were sent to other concentration camps, including Auschwitz, while priests from across Europe were condemned to death and labor camps: 300 priests died at Sachsenhausen, 780 at Mauthausen, and 5,000 at Buchenwald. These numbers do not include the priests who were murdered en route to the camps or who died from diseases and exhaustion in the inhuman cattle cars used to transport victims. Several thousand nuns were also sent to camps or killed on the way.

    The list of victims is a very long one, and the suffering on a daily basis by the priests is unimaginable. For many, the ordeal lasted for years. Adam Kozlowiecki, a Polish priest, was arrested by the Gestapo in November 1939 and was sent to Auschwitz in 1940; transferred to Dachau in December 1940, he spent the next five years there until he was freed by the U.S. army on April 29, 1945. Kozlowiecki was made a cardinal in 1998. A few of the other notable priests at Dachau were Bl. Michal Kozal, Bl. Stefan Grelewski, Bl. Stefan Frelichowski, Bl. Karl Leisner, and Bl. Titus Brandsma.’

    https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/catholic-martyrs-of-the-holocaust

Comments are closed.